The Greatest Ad Ever Told?
Today’s gospel and sermon were about giving thanks to God for what we have. It’s a pretty standard Christian lesson, in my opinion, and not really one that requires a whole lot of discussion. It’s just one of those givens.
The gospel story that was used was from Luke. It told the tale of the ten lepers that asked Jesus for healing. Jesus instructed them to go to the priests and they’ll be cured (in Jesus’ time, only the priests can decide whether or not someone has leprosy). Naturally they’re all cured on their way to the priest. Only one man comes back to thank Jesus and praise God, the other nine continue on to be declared cured by the priests. Jesus wonders were the other nine are but tells the one that came back that his faith has made him well.
So the moral of the story is to be thankful for God’s blessings. I’m more interested in the set-up of the sermon and another contrast to the Catholic Church.
The priest started the sermon by first saying that the story of the ten lepers was only told in Luke – not in Matthew or Mark. (Matthew and Mark do tell the more famous story of the sole leper that Jesus healed.) He then goes on to say that, like modern day advertisers, the writers of the gospel understood the importance of numbers…
The curing of a leper was only attributed to one man in the Old Testament – the great prophet Elisha. So the fact that Matthew, Mark, and Luke all attributed this miracle to Jesus was another way of tying him to the ancient prophets and kings, strengthen their case for Jesus as Messiah. Luke, however, took it a step further and said Elisha only cured one leper – Jesus cured TEN.
To hear the priest describe it as smart advertising was…refreshing.
Smart advertising doesn’t necessarily mean it was a false story – it was just a way to acknowledge that, at the end of the day, no matter what happened, these gospels were written by men that were trying to start a movement. History shows us that the gospel of Luke wasn’t written by the Apostle Luke. It was written by someone who was trying to compile the account of several texts and provide a single history, probably around 100AD. Whereas a lot of it was based on existing gospels and other texts, we sort of have to understand that some of it was, in fact, embellished.
Did the priest say that, exactly? No…but it was certainly subtly implied.
Even being subtly implied, we’re talking about something no Catholic Church that I’ve ever been to has ever even acknowledged – that the gospels were written by men and it’s not the literal interpretation of events that matters – it’s the message behind it.
It was a great sermon. I hung on every word mainly because it wasn’t about listening and following – it was about understanding and applying.
I have to say, I’m enjoying my return to the Church so far. I’m starting to feel like an Episcopalian.
The gospel story that was used was from Luke. It told the tale of the ten lepers that asked Jesus for healing. Jesus instructed them to go to the priests and they’ll be cured (in Jesus’ time, only the priests can decide whether or not someone has leprosy). Naturally they’re all cured on their way to the priest. Only one man comes back to thank Jesus and praise God, the other nine continue on to be declared cured by the priests. Jesus wonders were the other nine are but tells the one that came back that his faith has made him well.
So the moral of the story is to be thankful for God’s blessings. I’m more interested in the set-up of the sermon and another contrast to the Catholic Church.
The priest started the sermon by first saying that the story of the ten lepers was only told in Luke – not in Matthew or Mark. (Matthew and Mark do tell the more famous story of the sole leper that Jesus healed.) He then goes on to say that, like modern day advertisers, the writers of the gospel understood the importance of numbers…
The curing of a leper was only attributed to one man in the Old Testament – the great prophet Elisha. So the fact that Matthew, Mark, and Luke all attributed this miracle to Jesus was another way of tying him to the ancient prophets and kings, strengthen their case for Jesus as Messiah. Luke, however, took it a step further and said Elisha only cured one leper – Jesus cured TEN.
To hear the priest describe it as smart advertising was…refreshing.
Smart advertising doesn’t necessarily mean it was a false story – it was just a way to acknowledge that, at the end of the day, no matter what happened, these gospels were written by men that were trying to start a movement. History shows us that the gospel of Luke wasn’t written by the Apostle Luke. It was written by someone who was trying to compile the account of several texts and provide a single history, probably around 100AD. Whereas a lot of it was based on existing gospels and other texts, we sort of have to understand that some of it was, in fact, embellished.
Did the priest say that, exactly? No…but it was certainly subtly implied.
Even being subtly implied, we’re talking about something no Catholic Church that I’ve ever been to has ever even acknowledged – that the gospels were written by men and it’s not the literal interpretation of events that matters – it’s the message behind it.
It was a great sermon. I hung on every word mainly because it wasn’t about listening and following – it was about understanding and applying.
I have to say, I’m enjoying my return to the Church so far. I’m starting to feel like an Episcopalian.

